Good morning everyone,
Today I wanted to let everyone in on a little debate Bethy and I have had among ourselves for several months. I don’t mean a debate between us, but a debate we have been having collectively with ourselves. Ironically, it’s the same debate we’ve begun to see taking place around us as the world has been coming to terms with its definition of “Family.”
Our purpose in starting the Family Soup was to help people around us who felt lonely, helpless, and ashamed find strength and hope in their family situations by recognizing the reality of struggle in other families who might otherwise appear (or work hard to appear) “perfect.” There was a time when my wife and I questioned very seriously if we would stay together as a couple or have our family torn apart by some seemingly insurmountable differences. As we found a way to overcome our problems, we began to see that there were also other families and individuals who had also thrown off the strains of difficulty they faced.
The change for us was as distinct as night and day. We used to believe that if we stayed together, we would be looking forward to a life of general friction and sacrifice. Today we enjoy general peace, joy, romance, and harmony which we used to assume would not be part of this life. We are not the same person, but we are together in our direction, goals, and understanding; it hurts to say goodbye even for a short time.
There were many things and many people that helped along the way, for which we will always be grateful. But if you were to dope me up on truth serum, connect me to a lie detector, and technologically extract precise impulses of knowledge from my brain, in each case you would come to the same conclusion–that I know without a single doubt exactly when and how things turned around, and WHO suddenly stepped in and straightened everything out. Let the world doubt all they want, but my wife and I witnessed a miracle–and we remember it every day.
But in doing The Family Soup, we haven’t wanted to alienate those who need help in their families but who aren’t of our faith. We’ve struggled with how to approach the subject of family without dominating it with potentially controversial religious tones. And my last two sentences make me want to scream.
“Not of our faith?” “Potentially controversial religious tones?” You’ll have to forgive me, but it feels like trying to help someone get electricity to their house by rigging something with some “politically correct” double AAs when I know that right nearby is an outlet to the city’s main power source.
Or “I desperately need to get my plumbing fixed because my house is flooding! My plumber doesn’t seem to be doing the job, but I won’t use the plumber that fixed your pipes because that’s YOUR plumber. Oh no, I couldn’t do that! And by the way, I don’t want to talk about your plumber–it offends me.”
Or someone’s only mode of transportation isn’t working, their stranded, and they say “Fine, I’ll call the mechanic–but this is how I expect him to fix it or he’s outta here!”
Folks, either something works or it doesn’t. My faith or yours is irrelevant. THE major factor in saving our marriage was learning some things about life beyond this one–things that were important that we thought we already understood by virtue of the fact we were members of a church but in reality didn’t have a clue about. Our understanding of those things didn’t come by our own intelligent efforts to study them. They were handed to us on the inside, they were a gift. And they only came when we were completely honest with ourselves, were bereft of all of our pride, and turned to Heavenly Father completely. I don’t know what else to say.
So in the principle of honesty I intend to open up and be myself on The Family Soup. I intend to tell things straight as I see them and if it comes across as preachy or overtly-religious, I hope you’ll understand that for me truth doesn’t separate itself into people’s opinions or categories. Things either work or they don’t. Things either are or they aren’t. We can thank science for teaching us that when we observe the same result after repeated experiment, we can assume that we will continue to see that result in future application. I couldn’t agree more.
Thanks,
Calvin
Tags: Uncategorized by Calvin
No Comments »